CL : Where income tax department had raised no objection to
proposed scheme of amalgamation and same was in interest of company and its
members, proposed scheme was to be sanctioned
■■■
[2014] 49 taxmann.com 35 (Gujarat)
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
Welspun Fintrade (P.) Ltd., In re
MS. HARSHA DEVANI, J.
CO. PETITION NO. 17 OF 2014
CO. APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2014
APRIL 16, 2014
Section 232 of the Companies Act, 2013/ Section 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 - Amalgamation - Petitioner companies belonging to same
group of management sought for sanction of their scheme of amalgamation -
Regional Director stated that companies should have a common appointed date and
petitioner should undertake compliance of Income tax Act - Whether since there
is no legal bar on choice of appointed date and income tax department had no
objection to proposed scheme, scheme being in interest of companies and its
members was to be sanctioned - Held, yes [Paras 6 & 7]
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment